Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD64836A397 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:51:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00410-06 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:51:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:30.122348 by SQLgrey-1.8.0-rc2 Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF1036A390 for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:51:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net ([207.145.128.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RQiZW-0005IJ-Rs for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 16:42:52 +0000 Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.53]) by asbnvacz-mailrelay01.megapath.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9BCA7134F for ; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:42:37 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 25663 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2011 16:42:36 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 22390, pid: 2670, t: 1.2333s scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:52/d:13495 spam: 3.0.4 Received: from 25-76-42-72.skybeam.com (HELO [192.168.2.16]) (sribe@elevated-dev.com@[72.42.76.25]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 16 Nov 2011 16:42:35 -0000 Subject: Re: rsync and streaming replication Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Scott Ribe In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:42:34 -0700 Cc: "[ADMIN]" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1B71EF40-4799-4066-8192-3A792380958F@elevated-dev.com> References: <87pqgxf8p9.fsf@comcast.net> <639B3C52-BF6D-4CE9-A710-75D369E9607E@elevated-dev.com> <39A965E0-DE37-41F3-8D69-321419BB8B09@elevated-dev.com> <640CEEBE-CB12-4FC9-9758-0319A49E7ACF@elevated-dev.com> To: Jean-Armel Luce X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.18 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201111/87 X-Sequence-Number: 38681 On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:37 AM, Jean-Armel Luce wrote: > So, rsync --checksum looks better than rsync --all --all??? What the heck is that and why were you using it? -- Scott Ribe scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com http://www.elevated-dev.com/ (303) 722-0567 voice