Received: from clio.trends.ca (root@clio.trends.ca [209.47.148.2]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA82339 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:25:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ice.planet@post.sk) From: ice.planet@post.sk Received: from smtp2.vol.cz (smtp2.vol.cz [195.250.128.42]) by clio.trends.ca (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA26091 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:12:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from relay.globe.cz (relay.globe.cz [212.27.196.13]) by smtp2.vol.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA90194 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:11:58 +0100 (CET) Received: (from root@localhost) by relay.globe.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA09542; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:11:53 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:11:53 +0100 Message-Id: <200002212111.WAA09542@relay.globe.cz> To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Reply-To: ice.planet@post.sk X-mailer: POST.CZ mailer v1.2 Subject: Hi I'm new here and now i'm building a large DB (20GB data). I was looking around and i can't find any info if Postgres can manipulate so large DB with falls and data loss. I have found only info that postgres can manipulate DB larger than maximum file size. Thanks for help and sorry for my bad english. Ice Planet e-mail: ice.planet@post.sk