Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB519475A06 for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 11:22:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [216.187.105.150]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002D8475FEB for ; Mon, 13 May 2002 10:36:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B38D3F3F; Mon, 14 May 2001 06:39:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" Organization: DVL Software Limited To: Brian McCane Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 10:36:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: VACUUM FULL Reply-To: dan@langille.org Cc: pgsql-admin References: <20010513174635.5A26E3F45@bast.unixathome.org> In-reply-to: <20020513081324.L7552-100000@fw.mccons.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Message-Id: <20010514103902.7B38D3F3F@bast.unixathome.org> X-Archive-Number: 200205/111 X-Sequence-Number: 4286 On 13 May 2002 at 8:20, Brian McCane wrote: > On Sun, 12 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote: > > > > > On 12 May 2002 at 12:49, Brian McCane wrote: > > > > > I am on FreeBSD 5.0. > > > > There is a reason why you must be on 5.0? That is not recommended for > > "sane" people. > > > > 5.0 is -current and not the best place to be running important > > applications At present 5.0 is -current, which is the version which > > changes daily. It's really only for people who are developing FreeBSD. > > It frequently contains works in progress and experimental changes. > Trust me, I am fully aware of this :) I have been running BSD on my > machine Since Bill and his wife announed the release of 386BSD 0.1 in an > article in (I think) Dr. Dobbs. I tend to pick and choose my times when I > upgrade my OS, and the version I am now running is several months old. > When I see a new feature I like/need, and have seen no major complaints in > a while, I back up a week and grab a copy. Unfortunately, it has been a > while since I have been able to do this. You are clearly qualified.... ;) Too frequently we see people who jump into -current not knowing what they are getting into. Personally, I have too many other things to do to attempt -current. -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://freebsddiary.org/ - practical examples