Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Gary Stainburn <gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>
Organization: Ringways Garages Ltd
Subject: Fwd: Postgresql
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:51:04 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200302031351.04860.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi folks,

This was posted to one of the redhat lists and it got me thinking.

I would imagine that there is some sort of limit otherwise stale connection=
s=20
could be left hanging around forever.  However, PHP supports persistant=20
connections where it can go days without anyone accessing a page.=20=20

So what is the answer to the question below?

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Postgresql
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 08:10:53 -0600
From: "Delao, Darryl W" <ddelao@ou.edu>
To: "'redhat-list@redhat.com'" <redhat-list@redhat.com>

Anyone know if postgres has a connections limit by default?  I see a
connections limit in my conf file but it is commented out..Just curious what
the default limit is, if any.

Darryl


--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@redhat.com?subject=3Dunsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

-------------------------------------------------------

--=20
Gary Stainburn
=20
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000=20=
=20=20=20=20