X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [64.117.224.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378B7D1B54D for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:31:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([64.117.224.193]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [64.117.224.130]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82361-09 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:30:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.passofundo.rs.gov.br (unknown [200.182.187.131]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E890AD1B502 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:30:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.passofundo.rs.gov.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7145D46E1F for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:24:09 -0300 (BRT) Received: from pmpf.rs.gov.br (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.passofundo.rs.gov.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 3119246E1A for ; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:24:07 -0300 (BRT) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 17:24:07 -0000 To: Subject: From: X-Mailer: TWIG 2.6.1 Message-Id: <20031001172407.3119246E1A@mail.passofundo.rs.gov.br> X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200310/17 X-Sequence-Number: 10578 Hi, I'm using postgresql 7.2. While issuing the CLUSTER command on a table, I got some notices telling me "drop would implicitly delete ...". After the CLUSTER command, the table was like if was created again, and the grants were not preserved. The postgresql sql reference says "CLUSTER preserves GRANT, inheritance, index, foreign key, and other ancillary information about the table." I guess the CLUSTER command is not fully implemented in 7.2. Is it fully implemented on 7.3? Thanks.