X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787CED1B2E0 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:36:50 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 67498-01 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 15:36:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.osdl.org (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0E2D1B1F8 for ; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 12:36:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from osdl.org (ibm-b.pdx.osdl.net [172.20.1.51]) by mail.osdl.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6KFa7122392; Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:36:08 -0700 Message-Id: <200407201536.i6KFa7122392@mail.osdl.org> Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 08:36:27 -0700 (PDT) From: markw@osdl.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery To: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, kn@mgnet.de, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org In-Reply-To: <8063.1090206181@sss.pgh.pa.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 tagged_above=0.0 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200407/332 X-Sequence-Number: 12002 On 18 Jul, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs writes: >> Latest version, pitr_v5_2.patch... > > Reviewed and committed with some adjustments. I pull from CVS and and got the following message when I tried starting the database with the archive_mode parameter: FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "archive_mode" Have I missed something since it has been committed? Mark