Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2AB2E0042 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:04:22 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99340-01 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:04:14 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFFD2E006D for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 07:04:14 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv.i.zmi.at", Issuer "mailsrv.i.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DCDA9B for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:42:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.i.zmi.at (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0329BF61 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:03:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Organization: it-management http://it-management.at To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres and SUN Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 12:04:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) References: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC7776709@EROS.nexus-ag.com> In-Reply-To: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC7776709@EROS.nexus-ag.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3667491.Wu9mZjQFXu"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200804011204.10351@zmi.at> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.036 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.036 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200804/3 X-Sequence-Number: 28767 --nextPart3667491.Wu9mZjQFXu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Dienstag, 1. April 2008 Thomas Br=E4utigam wrote: > My questions is, is there a recommendation from Postgres about which > SUN Machine you should choose when you have a huge Postgres Database This is like you ask "I fly a lot, which airplane should I choose?".=20 Please provide exact information. What is "huge", which Sun's do you=20 look at. How many transactions per second do you need, how many users,=20 what kind of db, .... Still, even then I don't know if anybody could really help you really. I=20 couldn't, as we don't use any Sun's. :-( mfg zmi =2D-=20 // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0676/846 914 666 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 --nextPart3667491.Wu9mZjQFXu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH8giazhSR9xwSCbQRAokVAKDsGXklYzoV3nLY+A/9IkqM45Sc1QCfemKj m9YarG1xl56DrLghXJKbGpQ= =nvxD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3667491.Wu9mZjQFXu--