Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718972E00B3 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:15:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17361-01-4 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:15:19 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8334A2E0097 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:14:45 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv.i.zmi.at", Issuer "mailsrv.i.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D485E5A for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:53:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.i.zmi.at (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C443DBF61 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:13:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Monnerie Organization: it-management http://it-management.at To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgres and SUN Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 20:14:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 20070904.708012) References: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC7776709@EROS.nexus-ag.com> <200804011454.16613@zmi.at> <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC77767B6@EROS.nexus-ag.com> In-Reply-To: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC77767B6@EROS.nexus-ag.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8693765.i62Wg77Mea"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200804012014.41715@zmi.at> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.03 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL=0.030 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200804/15 X-Sequence-Number: 28779 --nextPart8693765.i62Wg77Mea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Dienstag, 1. April 2008 Thomas Br=C3=A4utigam wrote: > Okay thanks for that advice. Sorry its my first day on a mailing > list. No problem. > But do Postgres have a special recommendation which SUN equipment > runs perfect with a Postgres Database? I have nothing to do with postgres (well, I have to admin some servers=20 running it). Maybe other can give hints. Or where you can get paid=20 support/information. > A time for a query over 30 seconds I would say is to long. So the > machine should be fast enough to handle it in 10-20 Seconds. Price > for the Machine doesn=E2=80=99t matter at all. The machine should just fit > and can handle this kinda huge database. Still, we have no idea what kind of data is in there, what the queries=20 would look like etc. I'd say any Sun equipment will be running fine, as it's fine hardware.=20 =46or the sizing of that machine, I can only suggest running your=20 application on a test server. I'm far from being a specialist for=20 postgresql, but maybe other can help here too. mfg zmi =2D-=20 // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0676/846 914 666 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 --nextPart8693765.i62Wg77Mea Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBH8nuRzhSR9xwSCbQRAu8cAJ9DCpJzQERvRj/m3c2Od4Qm7VvU3ACgrjv0 LUyReFf3ALxvcW3fCFXgTKc= =2Jgd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8693765.i62Wg77Mea--