Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.184]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5C62E0094 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:08:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.184]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59439-10 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:08:24 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.5 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CC52E008C for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:08:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from jd-laptop (cmdalert.com [69.55.229.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3U0961L009573 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:09:07 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:08:29 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" To: Thomas =?UTF-8?B?QnLDpHV0aWdhbQ==?= Cc: , , Subject: Re: Remove Postgres from Solaris 10 Message-ID: <20080429170829.07b5233d@jd-laptop> In-Reply-To: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC785F3EF@EROS.nexus-ag.com> References: <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC78172B9@EROS.nexus-ag.com> <48168B9A.8060704@sun.com> <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC785F3EA@EROS.nexus-ag.com> <20080429165224.6d95756a@jd-laptop> <46F5921DF52F6E40860287B30CADADC785F3EF@EROS.nexus-ag.com> Organization: Joshua D. Drake X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/l5aHiK0uRKnzIrK5hRpCicS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:09:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200804/297 X-Sequence-Number: 29061 --Sig_/l5aHiK0uRKnzIrK5hRpCicS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 02:00:42 +0200 Thomas Br=C3=A4utigam wrote: > Hi Joshua, >=20 > Why does it affect shmmax? Because you would have two clusters access shared memory. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/kernel-resources.html Joshua D. Drake --=20 The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/=20 PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate --Sig_/l5aHiK0uRKnzIrK5hRpCicS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIF7h/ATb/zqfZUUQRAp/1AJ9JIR3P1/qYqZyIQlVj9ThONX6uowCgj599 i56tPuwHndxvZ8H8aoJbs2k= =ehQ3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/l5aHiK0uRKnzIrK5hRpCicS--