Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C8A650E9E for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:39:01 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 89282-03 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:38:52 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC42650E90 for ; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:38:57 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-93-117.bk6-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.93.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m612er86016763 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:40:55 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B18447C7C; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:38:46 -0400 (CLT) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:38:46 -0400 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Scott Marlowe Cc: Rafael Domiciano , Tino Schwarze , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Configuring Shared Buffers Message-ID: <20080701023846.GJ18252@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <3a0028490806301052y193a4aeayfcc6deafdeb1cdb2@mail.gmail.com> <20080630182830.GA5358@easy2.in-chemnitz.de> <3a0028490806301201m5e4c48d4qc51a880b8f80ecf5@mail.gmail.com> <20080701010927.GH18252@alvh.no-ip.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 19:40:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200806/271 X-Sequence-Number: 29609 Scott Marlowe escribió: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Rafael Domiciano escribió: > >> The Postgres version is 8.3.3 and I am using Fedora Core 8. > >> I have in the actual server around 70 connections the same time. I am > >> assigning for this 100. > > > > 100 MB? That's not very much either. You can probably get a hefty > > performance boost by upping it a lot more (depending on whether the > > machine is doing something else, or Postgres is the only service running > > on it.) > > I think he was talking about max connections. I'm not sure. My suggestion to Rafael is to try subscribing to the pgsql-es-ayuda list and asking there (assuming he's really spanish speaking). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support