Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BB164FC23 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:11:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25984-01 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:10:55 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mailsrv1.zmi.at (mailsrv1.zmi.at [212.69.162.198]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4D564FD83 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 05:10:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from mailsrv.i.zmi.at (h081217054243.dyn.cm.kabsi.at [81.217.54.243]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailsrv.i.zmi.at", Issuer "mailsrv.i.zmi.at" (not verified)) by mailsrv1.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1702EA0 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:10:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.localnet (saturn.i.zmi.at [10.0.0.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mailsrv.i.zmi.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FE572516 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:10:52 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Monnerie Organization: it-management http://it-management.at To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:10:52 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27.8-ZMI; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) References: <1218035421.19154.24.camel@oberschatzi.cff> In-Reply-To: <1218035421.19154.24.camel@oberschatzi.cff> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1299022.37QMyqnDal"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200812171010.53114@zmi.at> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200812/120 X-Sequence-Number: 30953 --nextPart1299022.37QMyqnDal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Mittwoch 06 August 2008 Torsten Luettgert wrote: > reindexdb dbname > vacuumdb -f -z dbname Just a question on this: Is the order correct or would a vacuum+reindex=20 be more correct? mfg zmi =2D-=20 // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 --nextPart1299022.37QMyqnDal Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklIwh0ACgkQzhSR9xwSCbQ0bwCg1PeDpVKe2iTwjlPQnO95MqmP Ag8An2fj9Kz18e8y6dxF9nU8mGR2ORuH =ZS/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1299022.37QMyqnDal--