Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D400C632520; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:14:02 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79076-02-2; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:13:59 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from is.rice.edu (is.rice.edu [128.42.42.24]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FAD632525; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:13:59 -0400 (AST) Received: from scan1.mail.rice.edu (scan1.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.160]) by is.rice.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E6541820; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:13:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from is.rice.edu ([128.42.42.24]) by scan1.mail.rice.edu (scan1.mail.rice.edu [128.42.58.160]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13278-04; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:13:56 -0600 (CST) Received: by is.rice.edu (Postfix, from userid 18612) id AFF6241819; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:13:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:13:56 -0600 From: Kenneth Marshall To: Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz Cc: paulo matadr , pgsql-general@postgresql.org, admin Subject: Re: [GENERAL] bytea size limit? Message-ID: <20090121151356.GB28522@it.is.rice.edu> References: <359812.4771.qm@web52512.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <2f4958ff0901210555y8b02b8dpa9db2b15873bf23a@mail.gmail.com> <20090121140623.GG14570@it.is.rice.edu> <901365.77018.qm@web52506.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <2f4958ff0901210707v5e639b39of59f678a19981c30@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2f4958ff0901210707v5e639b39of59f678a19981c30@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavis-2.2.1 at scan1.mail.rice.edu X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200901/89 X-Sequence-Number: 31136 On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 03:07:13PM +0000, Grzegorz Ja??kiewicz wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:02 PM, paulo matadr wrote: > > My system have very large ram size, so its possible review postgresql.conf ? > > > all depends on how you access DB, what type of drivers (odbc, libpq, etc, etc). > See, every time you pass a row , they usually have to allocate that > much memory, not only its quite inefficient, but also slow. > > As for the configuration option, I am interested in knowing myself too :) > I do not think that the size limit is a runtime option. It is currently compiled into the server. Ken