Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83A6634332 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00674-03 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:34 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from lists.commandprompt.com (host-159.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.159]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208306322EB for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:31 -0300 (ADT) Received: from perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (200-126-101-194.bk7-dsl.surnet.cl [200.126.101.194]) (authenticated bits=0) by lists.commandprompt.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2DFK0I0012753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:20:05 -0700 Received: by perhan.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A648647CDE; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:19 -0300 (CLST) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:13:19 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Carol Walter Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Strongly typed? Message-ID: <20090313151319.GD4379@alvh.no-ip.org> References: <9114EFEB-B699-4EC0-9201-35C0A49BC326@indiana.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9114EFEB-B699-4EC0-9201-35C0A49BC326@indiana.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (lists.commandprompt.com [207.173.203.159]); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:20:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200903/163 X-Sequence-Number: 31663 Carol Walter wrote: > I'm moving from PostgreSQL 8.2.4 to PostgreSQL 8.3.6. When I restore > the databases from the old instance to the new one, I get a lot of > errors where the data types in keys don't match, e.g. the data type is > integer in the base file but defined as numeric in the file that it is > linked to. These are running databases so this situation must have been > negotiated by 8.2 but not my 8.3. Is this something relatively new that > I'm encountering, or is there a parameter someplace that I have set too > tightly. It's new -- some casts changed from implicit to explicit in 8.3. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support