Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-4.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AB46324D1 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 17:18:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73343-04 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from momjian.us (momjian.us [70.90.9.53]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CDB633227 for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 17:18:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by momjian.us (8.11.6/8.11.6) id o4EKIag07340; Fri, 14 May 2010 16:18:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Bruce Momjian Message-Id: <201005142018.o4EKIag07340@momjian.us> Subject: Re: List traffic In-Reply-To: <4BED31F30200002500031751@gw.wicourts.gov> To: Kevin Grittner Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:18:35 -0400 (EDT) CC: "Marc G. Fournier" , Tom Lane , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Greg Sabino Mullane X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL124 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.033 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, FRT_ADOBE2=0.877, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/786 X-Sequence-Number: 162449 Kevin Grittner wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > > I can't imagine that there's not going to need to be a "catchall" > > list for problems that don't fit into any of the subcategories. > > > > More generally, we already have most of the lists that you > > suggest, and we already know that people frequently don't find the > > most appropriate list for postings. I don't think getting rid of > > -general would help that in the least. The way to cut down on > > misposted traffic is to make the set of categories smaller and > > simpler, not to redouble our efforts to persuade people to use the > > same or even more categories. > > Well, redoubling our current efforts to direct people to more > specific lists would accomplish nothing, since doubling zero leaves > you with zero. The description of -general includes: > > | General discussion area for users. Apart from compile, acceptance > | test, and bug problems, most new users will probably only be > | interested in this mailing list > > Given that, the fact that -admin, -novice, -sql, and -performance > collectively get as many posts as -general suggests that people are, > in fact, making some effort to find a list which seems a good fit. > Perhaps if the description of -general was changed to suggest it > *was* a catch-all for posts which don't fit the other lists, things > would improve. FYI, I usually email new people privately that cross-posting a question can cause the question to be ignored. They usually respond positively and avoid it in the future. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com