Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACB1632DB3 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:28:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59878-04 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 20:28:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mailgate.caprica.metux.de (caprica.metux.de [82.165.128.25]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B936325EB for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:28:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mailgate.caprica.metux.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o88KQ1YE007536 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:26:02 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with UUCP id o88KPH8k007483 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:25:17 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id o88KFCO9014644 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:15:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 22:15:12 +0200 From: Enrico Weigelt To: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: [NOVICE] - SAN/NAS/DAS - Need advises Message-ID: <20100908201512.GB31637@nibiru.local> Reply-To: weigelt@metux.de Mail-Followup-To: "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" References: <4C869432.3020604@emolecules.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.011 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_40=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/69 X-Sequence-Number: 35613 * Tena Sakai wrote: Hi, > I have been reading this thread and I got the idea that > SANs to avoid, but would somebody please give a bit of > Comparison/perspective on NAS? same as for SAN: measure it on your real workload and compare different products w/ similar stability and accessibility properties. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------