Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5D713364DE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:39:39 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62297-07 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:39:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from smadev.internal.net (host3.dynacom.ondsl.gr [62.103.35.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB19B133616B for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 11:39:31 -0400 (AST) Received: from smadev.internal.net (localhost.internal.net [127.0.0.1]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p0HFdVoJ062784 for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:39:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id p0HFdVJS062783 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:39:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) From: Achilleas Mantzios Organization: Dynacom Tankers Mgmt To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 9.0.2 explain analyze very slow (10x), compared to actual query time Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 17:39:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <201101111753.22602.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <201101150018.52133.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> <4D307B600200002500039620@gw.wicourts.gov> In-Reply-To: <4D307B600200002500039620@gw.wicourts.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201101171739.31000.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.451 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201101/100 X-Sequence-Number: 36540 =CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Saturday 15 January 2011 00:35:44 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Ke= vin Grittner =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > =20 > > I agree about the subject line. But whouldn't -bugs be a more > > apropriate place than -performance? > =20 > Is it returning incorrect results, or is it not running as fast as > you would like? alright i opened a thread in -performance. > =20 > -Kevin >=20 =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios