Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB661337B83
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2011 12:25:52 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 23366-02 for
	<pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Wed,  9 Feb 2011 16:25:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from locust.cns.vt.edu (locust.cns.vt.edu [198.82.169.14])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829E61337B81
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Wed,  9 Feb 2011 12:25:45 -0400 (AST)
Received: by locust.cns.vt.edu (Postfix, from userid 986)
	id 1F0FB118E10; Wed,  9 Feb 2011 11:25:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 11:25:45 -0500
From: Ray Stell <stellr@cns.vt.edu>
To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL 9.0.3 streaming replication failure
Message-ID: <20110209162545.GB3529@cns.vt.edu>
References: <20110209135548.GA27471@cns.vt.edu>
	<20110209142818.GA30017@cns.vt.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110209142818.GA30017@cns.vt.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.409 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	FS_REPLICA=3.599, SARE_SPEC_REPLICA=0.72,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Archive-Number: 201102/55
X-Sequence-Number: 36694

On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:28:18AM -0500, Ray Stell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 08:55:48AM -0500, Ray Stell wrote:
> my bad, this was a path issue, I was using a v8 pg_controldata cmd.
> the v9 pg_controldata looks good.  Sorry.

Come to think about it, could the pg_controldata check the version 
and give a warning rather than report corruption? 

This is not to excuse my stupor this morning, just a feature idea.