Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1031337BCC for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:15:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 49179-02 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.yitter.info (mail.yitter.info [208.86.224.201]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9741337BD0 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:15:35 -0300 (ADT) Received: from shinkuro.com (69-196-144-230.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.196.144.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AECA1ECB41D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:15:33 -0400 From: Andrew Sullivan To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: forums.postgresql.com.au Message-ID: <20110406121533.GC7335@shinkuro.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Sullivan , pgsql-general@postgresql.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/180 X-Sequence-Number: 174536 On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:08:15PM +1000, Elliot Chance wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > It has been a long time since this was brought up. It's time. > > Any important concerns should be discussed at (to keep everyone looking at the same place): > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Forums_at_postgresql.com.au > > But also keep general discussion on the mailing list. Having looked at that very briefly, there seems to be no consideration that this was all done once before, for Usenet. Has anyone looked at how those issues were resolved there? (FWIW, my impression was "mostly, they weren't". I have pretty serious doubts you're going to do better. Why do these two completely different styles of interaction need to be merged anyway? I think adding forum traffic to the mailing list will be yet another way to make the lists less useful.) A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@crankycanuck.ca