Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 11:07:33 -0400
From: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Rural Hunter <ruralhunter@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed
Message-ID: <20120924150733.GF21242@momjian.us>
References: <505C307E.20501@gmail.com>
	<1348403628.18490.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<505F1A98.9090901@gmail.com>
	<1348440393.18490.2.camel@vanquo.pezone.net>
	<20120924125500.GA21242@momjian.us> <50606726.3050802@gmail.com>
	<20120924142659.GC21242@momjian.us> <5060720E.1080903@gmail.com>
	<20120924145731.GE21242@momjian.us>
	<15359.1348499072@sss.pgh.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <15359.1348499072@sss.pgh.pa.us>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 11:04:32AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Well, if you run that query on template0 in the old and new cluster, you
> > will see something different in the two of them.  Could you have used
> > default in one and a non-dash in the other.  Did we change the way we
> > canonicalize the locale between 9.1 and 9.2?
> 
> IIRC, we didn't try to canonicalize locale names at all before 9.2.
> That initdb code you're quoting is of fairly recent vintage.

Ah, so that would explain the change he is seeing.  I will work on a
patch.  I am working on the information_schema patch now.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +