Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TljCJ-0008DG-D4 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TljCI-0004oL-UB for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TljCI-0004oG-9Q for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:14 +0000 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([74.208.4.201]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TljCF-00009p-Ac for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 16:42:14 +0000 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([172.19.198.43]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M4GzH-1SuJCE3c5D-00rqAk for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 17:42:09 +0100 Received: (qmail 25128 invoked by uid 0); 20 Dec 2012 16:42:09 -0000 Received: from 76.255.19.161 by rms-us003 with HTTP Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org,"Sylvain CAILLET" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:42:08 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" Message-ID: <20121220164208.14700@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Autovacuum issues with truncate and create index ... To: "Baptiste LHOSTE" X-Authenticated: #138763884 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer x-registered: 0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-GMX-UID: t1qhcNpk3zOlOQ09LnwhuAx+IGRvb4BY X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Baptiste LHOSTE wrote: > Here's the pg_stat_activity during the issue : > [no processes waiting] > Here's the pg_locks during the issue : > [all locks granted] Was the blocking you described occurring at the time you captured this? It doesn't seem to be showing any problem. > Is there a way to upgrade without having to dump all data and > restore them after the upgrade ? A minor release (where the version number doesn't change before the second dot) never requires a dump and restore. There is sometimes a need to do some cleanup work; for example, if a bug is fixed which could corrupt a particular type of index, the release notes may recommend rebuilding all indexes of that type to repair any damage which may have occurred before the bug was fixed. http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/ -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin