Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZQXR-0006gJ-1Z for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:53:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZQXP-0007Lt-TB for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:53:27 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZQXF-0007D2-Nt for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:53:17 +0000 Received: from mail2.reptiles.org ([198.96.210.226]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UZQX7-0001cM-N7 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 18:53:17 +0000 Received: from localhost by mailbox.reptiles.org via sendmail with STDIO (1841 bytes) (sender: ) (ident using UNIX) id for ; Mon, 6 May 2013 14:53:06 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.121 2005-Nov-17 #10 built 2010-Jul-16) Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 14:53:06 -0400 From: Jim Mercer To: Szymon Guz Cc: Craig James , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: top posting? Message-ID: <20130506185306.GB45442@reptiles.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:25:25PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote: > That's strange. I've never met any newsgroup which would require top > posting. Top posting has always been considered rude. > > We are reading from top to bottom. That's why people should answer below > cited text, so we can read it later normally. I mean that I should read > first the part of email you answer to, and than below your answer. i find bottom posting to be moderately more annoying than top posting. top posters are basically: i'm too lazy to spend any time editting, so i'll just toss my comments at the top, because my time is more important than anyone else's. bottom posters are basically: i'm too lazy to remove irrelevant content, but, just to be pedantic, i'll add my comments to the bottom. personally, i'll read top posts, and be a bit irritated. bottom posts, i'll generally skip because the author obviously doesn't value their own words. --jim -- Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 "He who dies with the most toys is nonetheless dead" -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin