Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WeV5D-0003IX-01 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:49:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WeV5C-0008RT-FM for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:49:50 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WeV5B-0008RM-ET for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:49:49 +0000 Received: from mailbox.reptiles.org ([198.96.117.3]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WeV58-0002Ez-9u for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 19:49:48 +0000 Received: from localhost by mailbox.reptiles.org via sendmail with STDIO (1804 bytes) (sender: ) (ident using UNIX) id for ; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:49:41 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.121 2005-Nov-17 #10 built 2010-Jul-16) Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2014 15:49:41 -0400 From: Jim Mercer To: Jerry Sievers Cc: Henry Korszun , Scott Whitney , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Message-ID: <20140427194941.GA16052@reptiles.org> References: <1398447433.8578.YahooMailNeo@web162701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <712112871.331097.1398447813672.JavaMail.zimbra@mail.int.journyx.com> <1398448636.25048.YahooMailNeo@web162704.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <2131729726.331419.1398448843621.JavaMail.zimbra@mail.int.journyx.com> <1398449399.70260.YahooMailNeo@web162701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <86k3adw9nh.fsf@jerry.enova.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86k3adw9nh.fsf@jerry.enova.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:23:30PM -0500, Jerry Sievers wrote: > Henry Korszun writes: > > I understand what you're saying, but I don't know what's causing the "touch" in the first place. I guess I need to further examine/debug. Thanks for your help. it may be a semantic difference, but is recovery_mode dependent on the existence of the trigger file, or the timestamp. "touch" in the above context could either be the creation of the file, or simply updating the timestamp of the file. i suspect that the recovery is triggered by the mere existence of the file, while henry might be talking in the 'update timestamp' context. --jim -- Jim Mercer Reptilian Research jim@reptiles.org +1 416 410-5633 "He who dies with the most toys is nonetheless dead" -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin