Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X4FVe-0006UF-Jg for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:27:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X4FVd-0006C0-2t for pgsql-general@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:27:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X4FVa-00065Q-1t; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:27:30 +0000 Received: from virtual1.potentialtech.com ([69.25.178.43] helo=mail.potentialtech.com) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X4FVW-0002EX-Oc; Mon, 07 Jul 2014 20:27:28 +0000 Received: from working (c-67-165-86-201.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [67.165.86.201]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 054D5224B1E; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:27:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:27:18 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Scott Whitney Cc: Mike Christensen , Prabhjot Sheena , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" , Forums postgresql Subject: Re: [ADMIN] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions Message-Id: <20140707162718.f1d66ba80aaea1d3ef3d5f3e@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.3.0 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-general Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 15:22:44 -0500 (CDT) Scott Whitney wrote: > It does say a FULL vacuum, and that you are not doing. You're confusing terminology. VACUUM FULL is not the same as a "full database vacuum". The latter is simply expressing that vacuuming individual tables won't fix the problem. A VACUUM FULL is not required. You really just need to wait it out. Although at the rate the number seems to be dropping, you may be in for trouble. > >
-------- Original message --------
From: Mike Christensen
Date:07/07/2014 3:17 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: Prabhjot Sheena
Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org,Forums postgresql
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] [GENERAL] WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions
>
Sounds like you just have to wait until it finishes.. > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Prabhjot Sheena wrote: > Hello > We are using postgresql 8.3 database for last 5 yrs for this production database and its running fine. This is our critical database which runs 24*7. This weekend we started getting these messages > > HINT: To avoid a database shutdown, execute a full-database VACUUM. > WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 8439472 transactions > > i am currently running this command > > vacuumdb --analyze db > > while this command is running i m still getting these messages > > WARNING: database must be vacuumed within 2645303 transactions. > > The value of number of transactions is going down every minute > > Can anyone tell me what is the best way to sort up this issue. > > Thanks > Avi > > > > -- Bill Moran -- Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general