Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHnE-000656-48 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:30:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHnD-0008F1-8Q for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:30:07 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHnA-00089M-El for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:30:04 +0000 Received: from momjian.us ([72.94.173.45]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHn6-0006Ge-7k for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:30:03 +0000 Received: from bruce by momjian.us with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YYHn1-0004IK-Ui; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:29:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 13:29:55 -0400 From: Bruce Momjian To: John Scalia Cc: Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website Message-ID: <20150318172955.GC13998@momjian.us> References: <5509A2A2.90305@gmail.com> <5509B1BB.4000306@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5509B1BB.4000306@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:11:23PM -0400, John Scalia wrote: > On 3/18/2015 12:48 PM, Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis@it.nrw.de wrote: > > John Scalia wrote on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:07 PM: > >> Or is some major flaw with 9.3.3 that should motivate us to get off it immediately? > > Consider this: > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1328517318.859752.1424472489522.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com > > "Oh, and please update to 9.3.6; there are some nasty bugs fixed." > Yikes, I see what you mean, even though we haven't experienced any issues with 9.3.3. You should all know that I personally have no problem upgrading at all and I've even put 9.4.0 > into a sandbox just to satisfy my own curiosity. The problem here is more political, including the fact that Verizon is trying to migrate off of postgresql. I'm reasonably certain > if I say to migrate to a newer version, the suggestion will get canned, and the order come down to start using NuoDB instead. We created the webpage talking about upgrading so people could point to that as support during political arguments about upgrading. -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin