Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aSmk2-0004NE-Lc for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:24:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSmk1-000157-2e for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:24:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSmk0-00014a-AR; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:24:36 +0000 Received: from mail.anarazel.de ([217.115.131.40]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aSmjx-0003mF-6U; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:24:35 +0000 Received: from intern.anarazel.de (tmo-103-20.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.103.20]) (Authenticated sender: andres@anarazel.de) by mail.anarazel.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 22A6A3ACE76; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:24:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:24:29 +0100 From: Andres Freund To: Evan Rempel Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: 9.5 new setting "cluster name" and logging Message-ID: <20160208142429.5by57csmc75gorg7@alap3.anarazel.de> References: <1377186808.57546.YahooMailNeo@web193505.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <1377494614.9111.YahooMailNeo@web193506.mail.sg3.yahoo.com> <56AC5601.5040208@uvic.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AC5601.5040208@uvic.ca> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Hi, (x-posting to -hackers, more relevant audience) On 2016-01-29 22:19:45 -0800, Evan Rempel wrote: > Now that there is a setting to give a cluster a "name", it would be nice to > have an escape sequence in the log_line_prefix setting that could reference > the cluster_name. I've argued[1][2] for this when cluster_name was introduced, but back then I seemed to have been the only one arguing for it. Josh later jumped that train. Given that we now had a number of people wishing for this, can we maybe reconsider? Greetings, Andres Freund [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/CADLWmXUm%3D7Y3UORZnGMdSC6p1eymO0k0JkH4NKr4KstdWk0P7g%40mail.gmail.com [2] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20140505101007.GU12715@awork2.anarazel.de -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin