Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-admin-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eHzM7-0003eN-Id
	for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:48:23 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-admin-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1eHzM7-0005VK-2D
	for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:48:23 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <andres@anarazel.de>)
	id 1eHzM6-0005V9-Rg
	for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:48:22 +0000
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <andres@anarazel.de>)
	id 1eHzLy-0006tZ-5M
	for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:48:22 +0000
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C63020716;
	Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:48:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161])
  by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:48:12 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
	:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=6amNt4Pn9aEnvZfmDLXv7Kuzlf2sm
	xo+iGrI2N9pLPE=; b=ZGqe2eqg5CxK9hV+tWy5XgaKzG9cYbdeoiDXPxWQ+es8N
	fP8C/8Pz4p0T9WZcB74q/UPuu/sw9ERfaAShINu3/TqRpDz6dXjyLNf+/sa3tMTi
	20D01HwLr2gwZXigaj9eEuYt701HnpN/fHDGHclEEi7JGOm0a415zKSnTE70IfFN
	MYoeMhzRLFlgIGu6Xeb7oBfoOkcBhlunT8lrCt26gtOwp6vMNejGF+dQnSTfEHTN
	X7mXcEuQ6t4TnHAWFkd2r8MbP/11inJ6GFKDpE5e/bQQozqqfnrGXdzsI6d9oEjV
	h33puXb+m0nzszS4uuuy0a4orWDF2gnooHn5Khemw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:HEIXWgIa0FDj1pS_CxQFJ2FVM0TW_oBLXltRFAGaPt_VSnCvInUjSw>
Received: from intern.anarazel.de (unknown [136.24.76.189])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D53B4240F8;
	Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:48:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:48:10 -0800
From: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
To: Debraj Manna <subharaj.manna@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Status of the patch "Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics"
Message-ID: <20171123214810.gbmrgspeurl2b5ry@alap3.anarazel.de>
References: 
 <CAF6DVKP782pqQtUxzFaTj092f+2z=UU+nhBLC=y-XNfqm8oZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAF6DVKP782pqQtUxzFaTj092f+2z=UU+nhBLC=y-XNfqm8oZMQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <pgsql-admin.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-admin-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-admin>
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 2017-11-24 00:15:44 +0530, Debraj Manna wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Can someone let me know if the patches discussed in the below blog
> 
> http://akorotkov.github.io/blog/2016/05/09/scalability-towards-millions-tps/
> 
> especially the below one has made it to postgres 10 or not? I am not able
> to figure out the status of the patch?

It has been applied not just to postgres 10, but also postgres 9.6. See
this note in the release notes:

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6.html
Replace shared-buffer header spinlocks with atomic operations to improve scalability (Alexander Korotkov, Andres Freund)

Greetings,

Andres Freund