Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbi0-0007Us-Nd for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbhz-0003I9-J3 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:31 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbhz-0003Hx-CI for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:31 +0000 Received: from smtprelay0008.b.hostedemail.com ([64.98.42.8] helo=smtprelay.b.hostedemail.com) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbht-000887-P0 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:30 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.248.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.248]) by smtprelay03.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17511A73DA; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 616C76686572726540616C76682E6E6F2D69702E6F7267 X-Spam-Summary: 50,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org,:::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:599:967:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1312:1313:1314:1345:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1519:1534:1538:1567:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2525:2560:2563:2682:2685:2828:2859:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3740:3865:3867:3871:3873:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:3947:3950:3953:3956:3959:4605:5007:6261:6630:7774:9025:9121:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12660:13069:13311:13357:13439:13894:13895:14721:14764:21080:21324:21627:30054,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0,LFtime:2,LUA_SUMMARY:none X-HE-Tag: pot16_1148ee5cf6053 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1454 Received: from alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (unknown [179.56.51.13]) (Authenticated sender: alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org) by omf05.b.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by alvin.alvh.no-ip.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 26824943; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:45:17 -0300 (-03) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 11:45:17 -0300 From: Alvaro Herrera To: Debraj Manna Cc: Mark Kirkwood , Alvaro Aguayo Garcia-Rada , pgsql-admin Subject: Re: Faster way of upgrading postgresql to 10 from 9.5 Message-ID: <20171125144517.wvsjlg2xeln5bood@alvherre.pgsql> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306-137-4415bd-dirty (1.8.0) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Debraj Manna wrote: > Mark > > Is this time expected? I mean 17 minutes for 490 GB. I could not find any > benchmark for pg_upgrade. Maybe, or maybe not. Perhaps you can profile the process, to see if any hot-spot becomes apparent, which can then be fixed. Did you already test your applications with pg10? -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services