Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkV9l-0002gL-DT for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:30:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkV9j-0006y5-KJ for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:29:59 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkV9j-0006xx-9C for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:29:59 +0000 Received: from hub.ringways.co.uk ([88.211.105.30] helo=ringways.co.uk) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkV9e-0007IZ-I2 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:29:57 +0000 Received: from eddie.ringways.co.uk ([10.1.1.115]) by ringways.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gkV9b-000DJe-Fs for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:29:51 +0000 From: Gary Stainburn Organization: Ringways Garages Ltd To: "pgsql-admin" Subject: upgrade from FC9 / PG8.3 to C7 / PG 9.6 - utf8 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:29:51 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201901181429.51278.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> X-Spam-Score: -50.3 (--------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ollie2.ringways.co.uk", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see Gary Stainburn for details. Content preview: I'm performing a long overdue upgrade of a Fedora 9 / Postgresql 8.3 to a Centos 7 / Postgresql 9.6 system. I'm just going though the config files to check that everything is okay and I've found a discrepency regarding language settings. I realise things have progressed a lot since 2008 when I built this server, so I wonder what is the right thing to do moving forward. The old system has [...] Content analysis details: (-50.3 points, 15.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -50 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 SCORE_RCPTS Adding score for each recipient 0.5 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address 1.0 RING_SAFE No description available. X-forward-disable: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk I'm performing a long overdue upgrade of a Fedora 9 / Postgresql 8.3 to a Centos 7 / Postgresql 9.6 system. I'm just going though the config files to check that everything is okay and I've found a discrepency regarding language settings. I realise things have progressed a lot since 2008 when I built this server, so I wonder what is the right thing to do moving forward. The old system has # These settings are initialized by initdb, but they can be changed. lc_messages = 'en_GB' # locale for system error message strings lc_monetary = 'en_GB' # locale for monetary formatting lc_numeric = 'en_GB' # locale for number formatting lc_time = 'en_GB' # locale for time formatting while the new system has lc_messages = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for system error message strings lc_monetary = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for monetary formatting lc_numeric = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for number formatting lc_time = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for time formatting Am I best changing the new system to match the old one? If I leave the settings as they are, enabling the utf-8, how will it affect a) the pg_dumpall / pg_recover process b) using the database moving forward? Gary