Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkVl8-0004fL-NG for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkVl6-0005pI-2w for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:36 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkVl5-0005gz-ON for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:35 +0000 Received: from hub.ringways.co.uk ([88.211.105.30] helo=ringways.co.uk) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gkVky-0008An-KQ for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:34 +0000 Received: from eddie.ringways.co.uk ([10.1.1.115]) by ringways.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gkVkw-000ERd-DU for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:27 +0000 From: Gary Stainburn Organization: Ringways Garages Ltd To: "pgsql-admin" Subject: Re: upgrade from FC9 / PG8.3 to C7 / PG 9.6 - utf8 Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:08:26 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201901181429.51278.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> <4e0b15ef7f84466b9370324b7f384972@imaginesoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <4e0b15ef7f84466b9370324b7f384972@imaginesoftware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201901181508.26233.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk> X-Spam-Score: -50.4 (--------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "ollie2.ringways.co.uk", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see Gary Stainburn for details. Content preview: That is a very good question. The honest answer is because the article(s) that I have been following have all pointed to 9.6. Having installed 9.6 and imported my data a couple of times I've found it faultless. [...] Content analysis details: (-50.4 points, 15.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -50 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.1 SCORE_RCPTS Adding score for each recipient 0.4 AWL AWL: Adjusted score from AWL reputation of From: address 1.0 RING_SAFE No description available. X-forward-disable: yes List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk That is a very good question. The honest answer is because the article(s) that I have been following have all pointed to 9.6. Having installed 9.6 and imported my data a couple of times I've found it faultless. Other than being on the latest version, what benefits and what problems would I encounter moving to 10.x? If I were to go to 10.x on Centos 7, would I be able to install it alongside the existing 9.6 to test it? I have noticed with the 9.6 install that it's now using the version number as part of the data path. As a side question, I will be moving PHP5 on my old box to PHP7 on my new one. Is there any gotcha's I need to worry about? On Friday 18 January 2019 14:52:25 David Modica wrote: > sorry, slightly off point but I am a newbie and I was wondering gary, > > why aren't you going to postgresql 10.X ? I keep thinking > > that I should stay as current as possible. should I relax about that ? > > david > > From: Scott Whitney > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 9:31 AM > To: Gary Stainburn ; pgsql-admin > Subject: Re: upgrade from FC9 / PG8.3 to C7 / > PG 9.6 - utf8 > > > So long as you use pg_dump from PG 9 to dump the PG 8 databases, you'll be > fine. > > > > en_GB.UTF-8 will be fine (and is probably preferred). > > ________________________________ > From: Gary Stainburn > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 8:29 AM > To: pgsql-admin > Subject: upgrade from FC9 / PG8.3 to C7 / PG 9.6 - utf8 > > I'm performing a long overdue upgrade of a Fedora 9 / Postgresql 8.3 to a > Centos 7 / Postgresql 9.6 system. > > I'm just going though the config files to check that everything is okay and > I've found a discrepency regarding language settings. I realise things > have progressed a lot since 2008 when I built this server, so I wonder what > is the right thing to do moving forward. The old system has > > # These settings are initialized by initdb, but they can be changed. > lc_messages = 'en_GB' # locale for system error message strings > lc_monetary = 'en_GB' # locale for monetary formatting > lc_numeric = 'en_GB' # locale for number formatting > lc_time = 'en_GB' # locale for time formatting > > while the new system has > > lc_messages = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for system error message strings > lc_monetary = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for monetary formatting > lc_numeric = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for number formatting > lc_time = 'en_GB.UTF-8' # locale for time formatting > > Am I best changing the new system to match the old one? > If I leave the settings as they are, enabling the utf-8, how will it affect > a) the pg_dumpall / pg_recover process > b) using the database moving forward? > > Gary > > > [Image removed by sender.] > > [Image removed by sender.] > [Image removed by sender.] > > [Image removed by sender.] > > > Scott Whitney > Director of IT > > [Image removed by sender.] > > scott@journyx.com | +1 (800) 755-9878 > > 7600 Burnet Road, Ste. 300 > Austin, TX 78757 > > Visit us at www.journyx.com > > > To unsubscribe from Journyx promotional emails, click here > or visit > http://journyx.com/communication-preferences. -- Gary Stainburn Group I.T. Manager Ringways Garages http://www.ringways.co.uk