Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkZ3J-0004Rf-2Y for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:11:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkZ3H-0006Vk-U9 for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:11:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkZ3H-0006UZ-Jp for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:11:51 +0000 Received: from tamriel.snowman.net ([2001:470:e38f::11]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hkZ3F-0003vu-1R for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2019 19:11:51 +0000 Received: by tamriel.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71B125F7B2; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:11:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2019 15:11:48 -0400 From: Stephen Frost To: Thorsten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sch=F6ning?= Cc: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Does anyone backup directly on Synology NAS using Barman or similar? Message-ID: <20190708191148.GD29202@tamriel.snowman.net> References: <623997363.20190708183825@am-soft.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M8g8Xvd1npd+rU3W" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <623997363.20190708183825@am-soft.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk --M8g8Xvd1npd+rU3W Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, * Thorsten Sch=F6ning (tschoening@am-soft.de) wrote: > I would just like to know if it's a real option to not need an > additional host or if that would be a waste of time most likely. Doesn't that provide a CIFS network share that you could then mount..? Or maybe an iSCSI LUN that you could mount to your database server? Seems like having a network mount and then using something which works with that kind of network mount would be a good option (pgbackrest supports CIFS mounts explicitly, I'm not sure about other tools). Thanks, Stephen --M8g8Xvd1npd+rU3W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJdI5V0AAoJEO1sijiDR2RVxHAQALpO1qSG/HXtC8uNGLFteaIu QApLF1yP5kVN6lcmtHQZJWiCGeOBckNco6Rh+qzebHGPpdOwNiiAtKnqdT8+1VUd r6fiakc90CclyqEiZnlpWTt6B22fWG0DOQXEqbGQITqmwzHX/NQoUyBrUh7a1c5z AwaXbzaqiaWCZncc7dogE9iq39O8JJGYKqbZfZZdAHZBd5OrADBQ76LOrO61TZrE ozhZLNibR3CRZDkBi9m+4/scvTENqbsdz+xPz68A7zshBp1Oh6N4N7sRAQEbHkgq 7liAZgp4xIQ3p8xqktgg3Ax6ltO/RZ43ET+PdBOjARkRqtf/QqP2/mDnDkpaz5Dt yVhsFBQNjXIcYkVrIEpRbZKNGnydPU0UKUskMbiUcU+tQgUGH69HNmOqXYgMjN8J W4gmFdrxZZ03MMAvqXBL+6NN3h75P9yi76aeM3P/vxayUQzwjeU/U9dglrmwLwi5 WiJxeq/Lf48J2XS5aVqtY6Eiy/i9/cqTnWzVD2GaisYBui8NsFM6BaKbseJyFR5U hPz6kC4TASQPYZ25wZudWIKvx4Q9nunT9vA77XG5LRlznsgY1V5B7DiPZ0NLGcIX H6e8yAM8CBGoC4xNC7O5zvi+5eZaySM3lqJoxa9Ry6X08ANjbjM9MFqYnYKXxIab iFdg2HvMJxfUvRAGx6um =yoVD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M8g8Xvd1npd+rU3W--