From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com>
cc: pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: make installcheck failing for postgres_fdw
In-reply-to: <22BD5B05-5E78-4902-AE67-CEC936243A7D@ebureau.com>
References: <22BD5B05-5E78-4902-AE67-CEC936243A7D@ebureau.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com>
	message dated "Wed, 20 Sep 2017 11:44:55 -0500"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <20707.1505930428.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:00:28 -0400
Message-ID: <20708.1505930428@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org

Natalie Wenz <nataliewenz@ebureau.com> writes:
> I have a server that has 9.4.4 with the postgres_fdw module successfully =
running for the past couple of years. I am looking to update it, so I'm tes=
ting the procedure on a test server, and have been running into trouble. Ou=
t of curiosity, I tried installing it with 10beta4, but the gmake installch=
eck failed. So I tried with 9.6.2 (because it happened to be on the machine=
) and it still failed. I tried 9.6.5--and it also failed.=20

> Note that the installation doesn't seem to have any issue, just the insta=
llcheck. Is this a known issue? Is it just a matter of the regression tests=
 lagging behind, or should I be concerned? The regression.diffs files are n=
ot identical between versions, but they only seem to contain query plans wi=
th differences.=20

If you're running with any non-default planner settings in your
installation, this would likely be unsurprising.  I'd try "make check",
which is more self-contained, before concluding you have a problem.

			regards, tom lane


--=20
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin