Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF39F632D87 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:40:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95581-03 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 14:40:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3655632930 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 11:40:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o5NEeBOE022371; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:40:11 -0400 (EDT) To: Glyn Astill cc: Igor Neyman , John Rouillard , Kevin Grittner , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: parallel option in pg_restore In-reply-to: <173433.23903.qm@web23607.mail.ird.yahoo.com> References: <173433.23903.qm@web23607.mail.ird.yahoo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Glyn Astill message dated "Wed, 23 Jun 2010 09:02:36 -0000" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:40:11 -0400 Message-ID: <22370.1277304011@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201006/188 X-Sequence-Number: 34966 Glyn Astill writes: > Good point. No I've not seen it on a file smaller than 2GB, but the test I did was pretty basic - I just trimmed down the size of all of my tables to create a dump that was only 50Mb or so. It looks like Igor has a reproduceable case now though, so hopefully Tom can figure out what's going off. I neglected to follow up to this -admin thread, but see http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-06/msg01227.php regards, tom lane