Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HD1-0006m5-Dk for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:21:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HD0-0004DB-AH for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:21:22 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HBI-0000RD-Gp for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:19:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HBD-00076I-Gd for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:19:34 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9VIJOVH023814; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:19:24 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: "David G. Johnston" cc: "Hunley, Douglas" , Tim Goodaire , pgsql-admin Subject: Re: FSM corruption and standby servers In-reply-to: References: <20566.1477932936@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to "David G. Johnston" message dated "Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:27:44 -0700" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <23812.1477937964.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:19:24 -0400 Message-ID: <23813.1477937964@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.6 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org "David G. Johnston" writes: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I would have thought that the referenced page is clear enough about >> needing to check the standbys; do you think it isn't? > =E2=80=8BI can =E2=80=8Bsee how the following is a bit loose for someone = not super-familiar > with WAL. Yeah. On the other hand, I don't want people who aren't running replication to stop reading as soon as they see something about standby servers. I tweaked the existing wording a bit to emphasize that standbys can be corrupt even with a valid master; hopefully that's enough. regards, tom lane --=20 Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin