Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wulzx-0000u4-NG for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:07:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wulzx-0001Lp-6A for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 17:07:41 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuiVS-00058G-L6 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:23:58 +0000 Received: from gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.38.55]) by makus.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuiVN-0006WH-O7 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 13:23:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 30482 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jun 2014 13:23:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy5.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 11 Jun 2014 13:23:43 -0000 Received: from just85.justhost.com ([173.254.28.85]) by CMOut01 with id D1Pd1o00G1qAwYl011PgBZ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:23:43 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=d4pml3TE c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=kIvvY/FtwpSFDkANa2b6Zw==:117 a=8AnNyXzHxsYBKFAy93QGqw==:17 a=BY8XqHikAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=pnGP-WSqAAAA:8 a=uFQQ-EmLGOMA:10 a=JOew2mxVUQAA:10 a=_6GpL_ENAAAA:8 a=XfX5FXB7O-KO-Ok5bG4A:9 a=lelMYG_oHYCrIp_M:21 a=BI0a_f5uPp1MTx7f:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Received: from [122.160.66.2] (port=56273 helo=localhost) by just85.justhost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1WuiV5-0003k5-8C for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 07:23:35 -0600 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 06:23:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Amit Sharma To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Message-ID: <24807186.80.1402492998639.JavaMail.lenovo@lenovo-PC> In-Reply-To: <4719279.79.1402492977003.JavaMail.lenovo@lenovo-PC> Subject: PostgreSQL db MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 140611-0, 11-06-2014), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Identified-User: {10597:just85.justhost.com:vertsco1:verts.co.in} {sentby:smtp auth 122.160.66.2 authed with asharma@verts.co.in} X-Pg-Spam-Score: 1.6 (+) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Hi, Hope I am not bothering you by sending this email. I had some query regarding Postgres & while doing research online I got your reference. We are using OpenERP an opensource ERP system. For one installation it require that there will be 3000 simultaneous users accessing OpenERP server, hence same requests will come to PostgreSQL server. And daily 500,000 (Half million)records will be added that means 15,000,000 (15 Million) a month. Can Postgres handle 3000 simultaneous requests and handled 15million records addition month on month basis. With this growth can Postgresql handle the volume for next 10 years or so? Any recommendation on Server configuration; we will be using Amazon Cloud. Thanks Amit --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin