Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52F91337B61
	for <pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2010 11:15:11 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 88890-01 for
	<pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2010 15:15:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD6E1337B5E
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Mon,  8 Nov 2010 11:15:04 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oA8FF2Ks024907;
	Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:15:02 -0500 (EST)
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
cc: Nick <t32@2thebatcave.com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin.grittner@wicourts.gov>,
	pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: autovacuum launcher process eating up 17G+ of ram? 
In-reply-to: <1289227352-sup-6579@alvh.no-ip.org> 
References: <AANLkTimGvWugpjwN1Ki=qmd56nsc4gXH6yKT5765nFPK@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CC071670200002500036C8A@gw.wicourts.gov>
	<AANLkTimKs23hytr6oj1Kco53rbaPF2mKTZZYofr0Cr0+@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CC18EF60200002500036CF3@gw.wicourts.gov>
	<AANLkTi=Mh=pv7Ai+L17cbjgsExMbncHG5fMTvj5_wCAe@mail.gmail.com>
	<4232.1288036630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1289227352-sup-6579@alvh.no-ip.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
	message dated "Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:01:51 -0300"
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:15:02 -0500
Message-ID: <24906.1289229302@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201011/62
X-Sequence-Number: 36028

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Patch for this is attached (applies cleanly to 9.0 and HEAD; 8.4 doesn't
> need to be patched, but I'll run the test case now just to be sure.)

Possibly s/cxt/resultcxt/, or some other less-generic name.  Seems
pretty sane other than that cosmetic issue.

			regards, tom lane