Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCGma-0000tw-9l for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:58:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCGmZ-0000RQ-Au for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:58:27 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCGmY-0000RJ-74 for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:58:26 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YCGmR-0000bO-4M for pgsql-admin@postgresql.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 23:58:24 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t0GNwEln028982; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:58:14 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Michael Heaney cc: Scott Ribe , "pgsql-admin@postgresql.org" Subject: Re: Huge pages not working on PG 9.4 In-reply-to: <54B995CE.5010301@jcvi.org> References: <54B98BB5.4050902@jcvi.org> <73DC9DCF-7C2D-49F7-8E8C-19F9C9E13854@elevated-dev.com> <54B991F5.7040505@jcvi.org> <54B995CE.5010301@jcvi.org> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Heaney message dated "Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:50:54 -0500" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:58:14 -0500 Message-ID: <28981.1421452694@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-admin Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-admin-owner@postgresql.org Michael Heaney writes: >> FATAL: huge pages not supported on this platform > Nope, that didn't make any difference. Since I compile my own > binary, > I'm wondering if there's something that 'configure' didn't set properly. A quick look at the PG source code says that that message means that MAP_HUGETLB isn't defined. Our code is expecting to provide that symbol, which it should do by default according to what I can see on my RHEL 6.6 box. Perhaps you've defined some of the feature restriction macros like _POSIX_SOURCE? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin