Subject: Re: postgresql and glusterFS
To: Prince Pathria <prince.pathria@goevive.com>, alfredo.deluca@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org
References: 
 <CAAWpFTHT5zNm2t37zNq0F3M1Umfo+2xPDhFd5cOUOX-KmYGSdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAON0Dawi8njWXJe+E38v11O3RQvgEz1bWxiTqT_wHtC0j3dDFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>
Message-ID: <33d48b8d-c5db-5f3e-102c-d6adf1f8defb@catalyst.net.nz>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:05:15 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAON0Dawi8njWXJe+E38v11O3RQvgEz1bWxiTqT_wHtC0j3dDFw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk

On 12/09/18 21:11, Prince Pathria wrote:

> Hey Alfredo,
>
> You can set up ceph as back end/data storage for postgres. Moreover 
> you'll get a better community support as well.
>

I'd add a +1 for Ceph as opposed to Gluster. Great community support and 
a better designed product.

Where I work, we run an Openstack Cloud with Ceph as the backing for the 
block storage provider (Cinder). A number of customers use Postgres and 
Mysql on this setup.

regards
Mark