public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Bossart, Nathan <[email protected]>
To: Michael Paquier <[email protected]>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <[email protected]>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:06:38 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUlDc/54/[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<YUKu89LBXr/[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<YUlDc/54/[email protected]>
On 9/20/21, 7:29 PM, "Michael Paquier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:08:22AM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
>> Should we also initialize the shared memory GUCs in bootstrap and
>> single-user mode? I think I missed this in bd17880.
>
> Why would we need that for the bootstrap mode?
>
> While looking at the patch for shared_memory_size, I have looked at
> those code paths to note that some of the runtime GUCs would be set
> thanks to the load of the control file, but supporting this case
> sounded rather limited to me for --single when it came to shared
> memory and huge page estimation and we don't load
> shared_preload_libraries in this context either, which could lead to
> wrong estimations. Anyway, I am not going to fight hard if people
> would like that for the --single mode, even if it may lead to an
> underestimation of the shmem allocated.
I was looking at this from the standpoint of keeping the startup steps
consistent between the modes. Looking again, I can't think of
a strong reason to add it to bootstrap mode. I think the case for
adding it to single-user mode is a bit stronger, as commands like
"SHOW shared_memory_size;" currently return 0. I lean in favor of
adding it for single-user mode, but it's probably fine either way.
Nathan
view thread (108+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox