Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKgWy-00ABsh-Cf for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:22:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKgWv-00A0el-LU for pgsql-admin@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:22:42 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKgWv-00A0eF-9N for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:22:42 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1tKgWu-001vdv-AS for pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:22:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 4B9GMd1K3910291; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:22:39 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Rijesh TP cc: pgsql-admin@lists.postgresql.org, Rajin Raj , Srikar Vankadaru Subject: Re: SSL SYSCALL error during logical replication In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Rijesh TP message dated "Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:54:58 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3910289.1733761359.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 11:22:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3910290.1733761359@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Rijesh TP writes: > We are encountering an issue with logical replication on PostgreSQL version > 15.10. The error message is as follows: > *"ERROR: could not receive data from WAL stream: SSL SYSCALL error: EOF > detectedLOG: background worker "logical replication worker" (PID 3286) > exited with exit code 1."* This seems to be a symptom of something going wrong on the sending side. Have you looked into that postmaster's log file to see what happened? regards, tom lane