X-Original-To: pgsql-admin-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507E553381; Fri, 6 May 2005 08:28:11 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 91655-03; Fri, 6 May 2005 11:28:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 3times25.net (duck.3times25.net [66.23.211.34]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45453397; Fri, 6 May 2005 08:28:08 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3times25.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F03743DB; Fri, 6 May 2005 07:28:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <427B54C9.2060607@3times25.net> Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 07:28:09 -0400 From: Geoffrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050422 Red Hat/1.7.7-1.4.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A real puzzler: ANY way to recover? References: <427A5472.8060004@roaringpenguin.com> <25542.1115317155@sss.pgh.pa.us> <200505052113.57362.peter_e@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <200505052113.57362.peter_e@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.015 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/64 X-Sequence-Number: 17493 Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >>Although I dislike last-minute fixes, I am strongly tempted to put in >>the ignore-datallowconn-if-standalone change in all the releases we >>are about to make. I'm curious as to what the purpose of such a setting might be (datallowconn = false)? Any functional use? (other than a tough learning experience?) -- Until later, Geoffrey