Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FC72E0031 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 20:07:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from developer.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69311-05 for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 20:07:21 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by developer.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488872E002F for ; Fri, 9 May 2008 20:07:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from [192.168.10.64] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-16-150.w83-112.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.112.196.150]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814932000; Sat, 10 May 2008 01:07:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4824D928.2050503@lelarge.info> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 01:07:20 +0200 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "MARIOTTI, Alessandro \(Alessandro\)" CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: debug issue on postgresql References: <85618CB6B1C0F14D888609DB41641AB40127F1EA@DEEXC1U03.de.lucent.com> <4824841F.4020104@lelarge.info> <85618CB6B1C0F14D888609DB41641AB40127F290@DEEXC1U03.de.lucent.com> In-Reply-To: <85618CB6B1C0F14D888609DB41641AB40127F290@DEEXC1U03.de.lucent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200805/76 X-Sequence-Number: 29160 MARIOTTI, Alessandro (Alessandro) a écrit : > Well I could shortly describe what's happen on these machines ; > > On May 7 2008 at 23:25 an operator performed : > > _a configuration change ; > > _add a new user on a table named MVNO; > None of these could have caused a corruption. > Customer told us that for “new user” operator add comma “,” symbol. > > This is something new for their provisioning procedure (it’s seems they > never test it )thus as soon as they propagate this updated DB over > machines of live net these started to discard all the requests and no > more user was able to work or work properly . > > Now they asking us what’s happen so this is the reason why I’m writing > here . > You'll need more info if you want to find out what happened. > Unfortunately I tried to verify the backup db but the one interesting > for us is empty : > > ls -l 200805* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842840 mag 1 04:03 > 20080501-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842840 mag 2 04:03 > 20080502-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842840 mag 3 04:03 > 20080503-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842840 mag 4 04:03 > 20080504-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842540 mag 5 04:03 > 20080505-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842613 mag 6 04:03 > 20080506-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 842613 mag 7 04:03 > 20080507-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > > *-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 mag 8 04:03 > 20080508-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql* > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 843960 mag 9 04:03 > 20080509-0403-cfg_xxxxxxx.sql > You don't a SQL backup, these won't help you. You need a backup of the database after the corruption. > I‘ll try to find it but but even if I can’t provide this back-up for > company policies reason , could I ask you some feed-back to get > suggestion to look for on this back-up file? > Nope. You didn't give us enough information to at least get started. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com