Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFDA650EDD for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:29:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55572-07-3 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:29:18 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D80650EBC for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 13:28:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:28:25 -0500 Message-Id: <486CB7E4.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.3 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:28:17 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: , Subject: Re: Best way to limit database sizes References: <619537.42270.qm@web53708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <619537.42270.qm@web53708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/43 X-Sequence-Number: 29653 >>> Dev wrote: > I have a single Postgres server which will be hosting multiple > databases belonging to different users. What would be the recommendation to > limit the size of each of the databases? Have you considered running a different cluster for each user? Each should be run with a different OS user ID, and it would be pretty easy to limit the size of each. -Kevin