Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C5A650ED3 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:32:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76677-04 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:32:11 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from gwmta.wicourts.gov (gwmta.wicourts.gov [165.219.244.99]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF74650EC2 for ; Thu, 3 Jul 2008 15:32:10 -0300 (ADT) Received: from Courts-MTA by gwmta.wicourts.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:32:02 -0500 Message-Id: <486CD4D7.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.3 Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:31:47 -0500 From: "Kevin Grittner" To: , Subject: Re: Best way to limit database sizes References: <486CB7E4.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov> <869366.20954.qm@web53708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <869366.20954.qm@web53708.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200807/46 X-Sequence-Number: 29656 >>> Dev wrote: > --- On Thu, 7/3/08, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> Have you considered running a different cluster for each user? > Doesn't it get difficult to manage so many instances of servers ? We haven't found it to be so. xargs is your friend, fed by find or cat. > Also don't we then need to keep > track of different port numbers for each user/group ? Yes. -Kevin