Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A120864FC31 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10425-01 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:39 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A465664FC2E for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:48:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 23 Sep 2008 19:48:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO peter-eisentrauts-macbook-pro.local) [195.13.166.253] by mail.gmx.net (mp058) with SMTP; 23 Sep 2008 21:48:35 +0200 X-Authenticated: #495269 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/ZcrEiThHZamnhjm4ldmDU1LERNGBdQB7Aqn1FKq rFkb46A3ThQVYC Message-ID: <48D9480F.2010005@gmx.net> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:48:31 +0300 From: Peter Eisentraut User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Page CC: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gerd_K=F6nig?= , pgsql-general , pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 8.3.4 rpms for Opensuse10.3 64bit References: <48D884F5.10806@transporeon.com> <48D89FE5.7010508@gmx.net> <937d27e10809230106y642d6cb9n4b5fbdfc06e97342@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <937d27e10809230106y642d6cb9n4b5fbdfc06e97342@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.66 X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Archive-Number: 200809/255 X-Sequence-Number: 30348 Dave Page wrote: > 2008/9/23 Peter Eisentraut : >> Gerd König wrote: >>> a few months ago we started using Postgres on Opensuse10.3-64bit. >>> We installed Postgres 8.3.1 with the (at that time) latest available >>> rpm's. >>> But now Postgres' current version is 8.3.4 and I'm wondering why there >>> are no new rpm's for Opensuse ?!?! >> The answer is quite simply that no one is volunteering to do the work. > > Oh, I thought you were looking after that build. If it's not being > maintained, we'll need to remove it from the download pages unless > someone else can volunteer? I am looking after it, but I cannot guarantee real-time releases with the resources available to me. Certainly, one or two more people joining the looking after would be welcome. I did some work recently to put all the pieces in place, so at this time we basically only need to replace the tarballs and release once in a while.