Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290D264FDCB for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:58:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 68666-05 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:58:20 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sd-2317.dedibox.fr (sd-2317.dedibox.fr [88.191.17.192]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FE364FDA9 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:58:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.10.64] (ASte-Genev-Bois-153-1-52-99.w81-249.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.249.146.99]) by sd-2317.dedibox.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4548F1B2A; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <494A029A.5090503@lelarge.info> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 08:58:18 +0100 From: Guillaume Lelarge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Monnerie CC: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5 References: <1218035421.19154.24.camel@oberschatzi.cff> <200812171010.53114@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: <200812171010.53114@zmi.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.693 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.693 X-Spam-Level: * X-Archive-Number: 200812/138 X-Sequence-Number: 30971 Michael Monnerie a écrit : > On Mittwoch 06 August 2008 Torsten Luettgert wrote: >> reindexdb dbname >> vacuumdb -f -z dbname > > Just a question on this: Is the order correct or would a vacuum+reindex > be more correct? > You should do a VACUUM and then a REINDEX. -- Guillaume. http://www.postgresqlfr.org http://dalibo.com