Received: from maia.hub.org (unknown [200.46.208.211]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF6963242E for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:37 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.208.211]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 33295-01 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:29:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from jonah.setonhome.org (mail.setonhome.org [76.3.225.43]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1456A632C25 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:29:26 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jonah.setonhome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8006CC6D5 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jonah.setonhome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jonah.home.setonhome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wruyajc2mVw4; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [76.3.225.44]) by jonah.setonhome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CF66CC6D4 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4BC5FB73.9@setonhome.org> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:29:23 -0400 From: Lewis Kapell Organization: Seton Home Study School User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-admin@postgresql.org Subject: Migrating from 8.3 to 8.4 on the same server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.324 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=AWL=-1.114, BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201004/172 X-Sequence-Number: 34266 In the documentation under the heading "Migration Between Releases" we read: <> In the section "Warm Standby Servers for High Availability" it says: << For testing purposes, it is possible to run both primary and standby servers on the same system. >> Although this section does not use the term Point-In-Time Recovery, I understand this is what it refers to. Could the WAL/PITR method then be used to upgrade from 8.3 to 8.4 on the same server and avoid having the significant downtime of dump/restore? If so, I understand the two servers would have to run on different ports. Are there any other issues/traps to be aware of? -- Thank you, Lewis Kapell Computer Operations Seton Home Study School