Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C97A632E9D for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:06:59 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63560-08 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 19:06:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ew0-f223.google.com (mail-ew0-f223.google.com [209.85.219.223]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6D1632DC2 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 16:06:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so683766ewy.34 for ; Thu, 13 May 2010 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vpscfKFZr27cnDA0CRvgp47Rjat4ANqHlnmnH9oP/Wg=; b=SySzpqdLki6n9lwkx8qjVvbRSV81lv+NtLOC9Pi+pXYOEMCE4VcMsk/veG6i5V9R00 1oKia8YZR7TkzeOT/pqhlAu6BJtVWWu1wnz5E5Dy5UJC2QcJYD7YDypwbzpX/FtVt8uV aus1gXPObipO1Ep4Gja16skWqvSDhJvlSk5UA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=onmkh/Xtli1ENVRWkRRyaRthbV2tbJVmRwM1rHdNOgeYEXSonytUqQFwfLJDt6gw1F AfMc89hRSkXotujTW1TGOncUvVaRYluqDS2lZurbBI1vcaLZHPpL7Mam2MV2CYezqLY2 Z+ilaRUU+LvfOmKPKlySaLGH/zvFG315Doc5A= Received: by 10.213.43.79 with SMTP id v15mr147597ebe.60.1273777609186; Thu, 13 May 2010 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (5357DA75.cable.casema.nl [83.87.218.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 14sm854544ewy.10.2010.05.13.12.06.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 13 May 2010 12:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BEC4DCD.3050602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 21:06:53 +0200 From: Yeb Havinga User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Stark CC: Robert Haas , "Marc G. Fournier" , Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: List traffic References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us> <1273598624-sup-3654@alvh.no-ip.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/692 X-Sequence-Number: 162355 Greg Stark wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> The difference between discussing a patch and discussing an idea that >> might lead to a patch is fairly fine. >> > > And importantly -- who would be able to subscribe to one and not the > other? If you have to subscribe to both to get make any sense of > things then there's no point. > > Fwiw I'm having trouble keeping up these days too. And I'm quite > accustomed to very heavy traffic email. I've been throwing all > postgres related lists into one folder and skimmed through it looking > for important threads. However this has now broken down. There are > about 45 new threads every day. I've been travelling for a bit and am > now 1,500 threads behind... > I've only been actively reading the pg lists for a few months now, after several previous attempts that failed mainly because the way I set it up did not work nice, mainly because of the volume. I tried digests, didn't like it (how to reply?), also didn't like that the pg mails that were so many completely swamped the 'main' email I use. Now I made a new gmail account, subscribed to all lists with some volume and let it all message per message come into the inbox. Together with thunderbird/imap this works quite nicely. With filters it's possible to tag interesting messages (like does the To: contain my email? -> tag it so it becomes green). Now I only need to view unread mails, (by thread or date), read some messages and then ctrl-shift-c - all read. My $0.02 - I like the whole 'don't sort, search' (or how did they call it?) just let the inbox fill up, google is fast enough. What would be really interesting is to have some extra 'tags/headers' added to the emails (document classification with e.g. self organizing map/kohonen), so my local filters could make labels based on that, instead of perhaps badly spelled keywords in subjects or message body. regards, Yeb Havinga