Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DFC632CAD for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:45:18 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57260-07 for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from glacier.frostconsultingllc.com (glacier.frostconsultingllc.com [69.36.227.170]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7185632B0E for ; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:45:06 -0300 (ADT) Received: from dsl081-245-111.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([64.81.245.111] helo=Sidney-Stratton.local) by glacier.frostconsultingllc.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OI6QB-0007Kv-M4; Fri, 28 May 2010 13:44:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4C002B3F.2020009@agliodbs.com> Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 13:44:47 -0700 From: Josh Berkus User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090223 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Lane CC: Greg Stark , "Marc G. Fournier" , Jaime Casanova , Greg Smith , jd@commandprompt.com, Magnus Hagander , Robert Haas , Alvaro Herrera , Bruce Momjian , Simon Riggs , pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: List traffic References: <201005111350.o4BDo4x27597@momjian.us> <20506.1273785548@sss.pgh.pa.us> <1273790358.8624.3132.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com> <4913.1273790764@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4BECC5E5.1000901@2ndquadrant.com> <4BFEB5E7.6080504@agliodbs.com> <7191.1274990914@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4BFF0FFC.3070009@agliodbs.com> <13846.1275007329@sss.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <13846.1275007329@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201005/1804 X-Sequence-Number: 163467 On 5/27/10 5:42 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus writes: >> We do not have a problem. The lists are fine the way they are. > > +1 ... wasn't the point I thought you were trying to make, but I'm > good with not changing things. Yeah, that's because I was responding to the suggestion that 5 of our lists should be collapsed into 'general' as the One Uber-List. -- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://www.pgexperts.com