Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-2.hub.org [200.46.204.251])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FB01337B93
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2011 04:55:51 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.251]) (amavisd-maia,
	port 10024) with ESMTP id 27228-03
	for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2011 08:55:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E821337B8D
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  8 Mar 2011 04:55:43 -0400 (AST)
Received: from source ([209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1) by
	exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP
	ID DSNKTXXvDqn/wljYXuvmMg3egPAi94SHthvF@postini.com;
	Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:55:44 PST
Received: by ewy10 with SMTP id 10so2396852ewy.14
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:55:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.98.145 with SMTP id q17mr668486ebn.45.1299574541210;
	Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:55:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.183] (dsl-hkibrasgw2-ff7ac300-240.dhcp.inet.fi
	[88.195.122.240])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t50sm434695eeh.0.2011.03.08.00.55.39
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D75EF0A.6000307@enterprisedb.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 10:55:38 +0200
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; fi-FI;
	rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101226 Icedove/3.0.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: daveg <daveg@sonic.net>
CC: Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Re: PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag was incorrectly set happend
	during repeatable vacuum
References: <1B3CCBDD-4AC6-404A-9E26-DB4CA2554228@endpoint.com>
	<AANLkTi=xq4SV6jwA7txvrbEWocyeiU6XiTG=-zVy+7Dq@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTi=Ye7AoF7_uVQfPVn-ok2VOp65mi0xU3H7kCke3@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110303071208.GA4053@sonic.net>
	<4D6F4E5D.6080507@enterprisedb.com>
	<20110304090031.GE4053@sonic.net>
	<4D710ABD.5090103@enterprisedb.com>
	<20110307235340.GA21941@sonic.net>
	<AANLkTi=54GF1MJN3FSXL2gr9xG_aB09y_taT8daUwz4Z@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D75E201.20402@enterprisedb.com>
	<20110308083808.GD21941@sonic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110308083808.GD21941@sonic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.2 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201103/539
X-Sequence-Number: 183789

On 08.03.2011 10:38, daveg wrote:
> I read this to mean that it is safe to ignore this warning and that these
> databases are not at risk for data corruption or wrong results so long as
> the warning is due to oldestxmin.  Please correct me if I have misunderstood.

Yes, that's correct.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com