Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425A0133798E for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:44:25 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27836-02 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 18:44:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com (host-215.commandprompt.net [207.173.203.215]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE2E13364DE for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 15:44:15 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303E7348046 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:44:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at commandprompt.com Received: from spinlock.commandprompt.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spinlock.commandprompt.com.commandprompt.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mogQ8uadp-us for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.17.148.44] (unknown [12.192.110.2]) by spinlock.commandprompt.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CFC6348022 for ; Tue, 3 May 2011 11:44:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC04CF7.7080508@commandprompt.com> Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 11:44:07 -0700 From: "Joshua D. Drake" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Can we Flush the Postgres Shared Memory ? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201105/96 X-Sequence-Number: 175528 On 5/3/2011 7:33 AM, Simon Riggs wrote: > > Pleased to meet you Mark. > > If you post here, the above disclaimer is not effective. Right now > your words are being copied across the internet... > I believe our community needs to move past posting replies like this. It isn't even relevant to the context of his question and makes us look like a bunch of ideological buffoons. JD